Skip to content
SteelHomes — Miami, FL — SteelHomes: The Capital Package for a 12× Capacity Step-Change

Construction & Modular Housing

SteelHomes: The Capital Package for a 12× Capacity Step-Change

SteelHomes — Miami, FL

$60M

equity raise to fund a robotics-driven production plant

12×

capacity step-change: ~96 to 1,200 units per year

$303M

Year-5 projected revenue, at ~26% EBITDA margins

$1M → $7.6M

revenue already scaled 2020–2023, and profitable

Situation

SteelHomes is a steel-frame, 3D-volumetric modular home builder with something most raising companies lack: a real, profitable track record. Since 2020 it has grown revenue from $1.0M to $7.6M, turned profitable, and earned a rare Florida Category-5 (180 mph) hurricane approval — a genuine moat in hurricane-exposed markets, against a U.S. housing market short 3.8 million homes and a modular sector compounding at 7.5% a year.

The constraint was capacity, not demand. The existing plant is capped at roughly 8 homes a month, and the balance sheet couldn’t self-fund the step-change to national relevance. The engagement’s job was to build the capital package that turns a proven small builder into a financed scale story.

The engagement

CMA built the investor- and lender-ready package — business plan, financial model, brand, and deck — around one clear thesis: fund the plant, unlock the capacity, and convert it through a channel.

A pro forma grounded in real actuals

The credibility of the raise rests on the fact that the projection isn’t a cold start — it’s the extension of a real revenue history. The model carries the audited $1.0M→$7.6M actuals straight into the post-funding ramp, so the step-change from ~$7.6M to a Year-1 of ~$32.8M is explicitly a capacity story, not a hopeful hockey stick.

Revenue: 2020 actuals → Year-5 pro forma $0M $100M $200M $300M $400M 2020202120222023Yr 1Yr 2Yr 3Yr 4Yr 5 Revenue ($M) — actuals then pro forma
Exhibit 1 — Revenue, actuals through projection (USD millions). The jump between 2023 and Year 1 is the post-funding capacity step — the plant coming online — not an assumed acceleration of the existing business.

That top line converts to ~26% EBITDA margins at scale — the margin profile automation and volume are meant to unlock.

Projected EBITDA, Years 1–5 $0M $20M $40M $60M $80M $100M $6.9M Yr 1 $36.2M Yr 2 $43.1M Yr 3 $65.2M Yr 4 $80.5M Yr 5
Exhibit 2 — Projected EBITDA by year (USD millions). Margins expand from 21% to ~26.5% as the robotics plant drives labor and overhead down as a share of revenue.

The step-change the $60M actually buys

The raise is legible because it maps to one physical thing: a 200,000-sq-ft, robotics-driven plant that lifts annual capacity roughly 12× — from ~96 units a year to 1,200 — paired with 40 regional sales centers to fill it. The whole investment case is that capacity, not demand, was the ceiling.

Production capacity: current vs. new plant 0 units/yr 500 units/yr 1,000 units/yr 1,500 units/yr ~96/yr Current plant 1,200/yr New robotics plant
Exhibit 3 — Annual production capacity, current plant vs. the financed plant. The raise buys a ~12× step-change — the single constraint standing between a proven builder and a national one.

Why the structure mattered

The discipline was to anchor the raise to a proven base and a physical constraint. A modular-housing pitch that projects hundreds of millions from a standing start reads as fantasy; the same projection built off a real $1M→$7.6M history, tied to a specific plant and a quantified 12× capacity step, reads as a financeable plan. The Category-5 moat gives the demand case teeth; the actuals give the pro forma credibility; the plant gives the capital a job.

Impact

SteelHomes left with a complete, funding-ready capital package: a demand case built on a Cat-5 moat and a 7.5%-CAGR market, a pro forma grounded in real $1M→$7.6M actuals, and a $60M raise sized to a 12× capacity step-change toward $303M in Year-5 revenue at ~26% EBITDA margins. (Pro forma figures are projections from the raising materials; historical figures are actuals.)

The company had already proven it could build and sell — the raise was about removing the one constraint left: capacity.

Engagement details are shared with client permission or presented in anonymized form. Results described are specific to the engagement and client circumstances shown and are not a guarantee of future outcomes. See our full disclaimer.

The Transformation

Before & after

Before

A profitable builder capped at ~8 homes a month.

After

A financed plan for a plant producing 1,200 units a year.

Before

A hurricane-resilience moat with no capital to scale it.

After

A $60M raise sized to a 12× capacity step-change.

Before

A pitch on ambition.

After

A pro forma from a real $1M→$7.6M actual track record.

Before

Growth throttled by cash flow.

After

A capital package matched to the plant and the channel to fill it.

The Work, In Sequence

How the engagement ran

  1. 1

    The demand case

    A market read grounded in a 7.5%-CAGR North American modular sector, a 3.8M-home U.S. shortage, and a rare Florida Category-5 (180 mph) approval — the differentiator that makes SteelHomes specifiable in hurricane markets.

  2. 2

    From a real track record to a pro forma

    A five-year projection built off audited actuals — revenue already scaled from $1.0M (2020) to $7.6M (2023) at profit — modeling the post-plant ramp to $303M at ~26% EBITDA margins.

  3. 3

    The capacity step-change & the raise

    A $60M equity raise funding a 200,000-sq-ft robotics plant that lifts capacity ~12× (to 1,200 units/yr), plus 40 regional sales centers to convert that capacity into a channel.

Want results like these?

Every engagement starts the same way: a 30-minute call about your situation.

or call (573) 747-5573

Search CMA